AI4Meder

AI4Meder 站内搜索

搜索医学 AI 论文与资源

按论文、数据资源、技术竞赛、投稿截止日期和课程资源检索社区内容,快速进入对应详情页。

3 条结果

输入关键词或点击标签,按论文、数据资源、竞赛截止日期、征稿与课程缩小范围。 标签:ai for healthcare 范围:论文

清空筛选
论文ICLR 2026 Oral2026 年clinical prediction

BioX-Bridge:跨生物信号的无监督跨模态知识迁移模型桥接

ICLR 2026 Oral accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Biosignals offer valuable insights into the physiological states of the human body. Although biosignal modalities differ in functionality, signal fidelity, sensor comfort, and cost, they are often intercorrelated, reflecting the holistic and interconnected nature of human physiology. This opens up the possibility of performing the same tasks using alternative biosignal modalities, thereby improving the accessibility, usability, and adaptability of health monitoring systems. However, the limited availability of large labeled datasets presents challenges for training models tailored to specific tasks and modalities of interest.

论文ICLR 2026 Poster2026 年clinical prediction

泛癌筛查中的扫视-聚焦强化机制

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Pan-cancer screening in large-scale CT scans remains challenging for existing AI methods, primarily due to the difficulty of localizing diverse types of tiny lesions in large CT volumes. The extreme foreground-background imbalance significantly hinders models from focusing on diseased regions, while redundant focus on healthy regions not only decreases the efficiency but also increases false positives. Inspired by radiologists' glance and focus diagnostic strategy, we introduce GF-Screen, a Glance and Focus reinforcement learning framework for pan-cancer screening. GF-Screen employs a Glance model to localize the diseased regions and a Focus model to precisely segment the lesions, where segmentation results of the Focus model are leveraged to reward the Glance model via Reinforcement Learning (RL). Code/project link: https://github.com/Luffy03/GF-Screen

论文ICLR 2026 Poster2026 年trustworthy medical AI

超越医学考试:面向心理健康真实任务与模糊性的临床医生标注公平性数据集

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Current medical language model (LM) benchmarks often over-simplify the complexities of day-to-day clinical practice tasks and instead rely on evaluating LMs on multiple-choice board exam questions. In psychiatry especially, these challenges are worsened by fairness and bias issues, since models can be swayed by patient demographics even when those factors should not influence clinical decisions. Thus, we present an expert-created and annotated dataset spanning five critical domains of decision-making in mental healthcare: treatment, diagnosis, documentation, monitoring, and triage. This U.S. centric dataset — created without any LM assistance — is designed to capture the nuanced clinical reasoning and daily ambiguities mental health practitioners encounter, reflecting the inherent complexities of care delivery that are missing from existing datasets.