搜索医学 AI 论文与资源

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. The ability to distinguish subtle differences between visually similar images is essential for diverse domains such as industrial anomaly detection, medical imaging, and aerial surveillance. While comparative reasoning benchmarks for vision-language models (VLMs) have recently emerged, they primarily focus on images with large, salient differences and fail to capture the nuanced reasoning required for real-world applications. In this work, we introduce **VLM-SubtleBench**, a benchmark designed to evaluate VLMs on *subtle comparative reasoning*. Our benchmark covers ten difference types—Attribute, State, Emotion, Temporal, Spatial, Existence, Quantity, Quality, Viewpoint, and Action—and curate paired question–image sets reflecting these fine-grained variations.

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. We study logical reasoning in language models by asking whether their errors follow established human fallacy patterns. Using the Erotetic Theory of Reasoning (ETR) and its open‑source implementation, PyETR, we programmatically generate 383 formally specified reasoning problems and evaluate 38 models. For each response, we judge logical correctness and, when incorrect, whether it matches an ETR‑predicted fallacy. Two results stand out: (i) as a capability proxy (Chatbot Arena Elo) increases, a larger share of a model’s incorrect answers are ETR‑predicted fallacies ($\rho=0.360, p=0.0265$), while overall correctness on this dataset shows no correlation with capability; (ii) reversing premise order significantly reduces fallacy production for many models, mirroring human order effects.

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Systematic reviews (SR), in which experts summarize and analyze evidence across individual studies to provide insights on a specialized topic, are a cornerstone for evidence-based clinical decision-making, research, and policy. Given the exponential growth of scientific articles, there is growing interest in using large language models (LLMs) to automate SR generation. However, the ability of LLMs to critically assess evidence and reason across multiple documents to provide recommendations at the same proficiency as domain experts remains poorly characterized. We therefore ask: **Can LLMs match the conclusions of systematic reviews written by clinical experts when given access to the same studies?** To explore this question, we present MedEvidence, a benchmark pairing findings from 100 medical SRs with the studies they are based on.

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. In precision medicine, quantitative multi-omic features, topological context, and textual biological knowledge play vital roles in identifying disease-critical signaling pathways and targets, guiding the discovery of novel therapeutics and effective treatment strategies. Existing pipelines capture only one or two of these—numerical omics ignore topological context, text-centric LLMs lack quantitative grounded reasoning, and graph-only models underuse rich node semantics and the generalization power of LLMs—thereby limiting mechanistic interpretability. Although Process Reward Models (PRMs) aim to guide reasoning in LLMs, they remain limited by coarse step definitions, unreliable intermediate evaluation, and vulnerability to reward hacking with added computational cost. These gaps motivate jointly integrating quantitative multi-omic signals, topological structure with node annotations, and literature-scale text via LLMs, using subgraph reasoning as the principle bridge linking numeric evidence, topological knowledge and language context.

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Segmentation in pathology image requires handling out-of-domain tissue morphologies and new pathologies beyond training distributions, where traditional closed-set segmentation approaches fail to generalize. Reasoning segmentation enables zero-shot generalization via prompting with text queries. However, existing reasoning segmentation models face three barriers when applied to pathology: (1) the vision encoder lack pathology-specific knowledge and robustness to staining variations, (2) the large language model (LLM) backbone for reasoning fails to identify whether it has gathered sufficient semantic context to trigger the segmentation output, and (3) no reasoning segmentation benchmarks and datasets exist for pathology analysis. Consequently, we introduce PathChat-SegR1, a reasoning segmentation model built upon pathology-specific vision encoders trained with a novel stain-invariant self-distillation for robust pathology image representations.

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. The application of large language models (LLMs) in the medical field has garnered significant attention, yet their reasoning capabilities in more specialized domains like anesthesiology remain underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce AnesSuite, the first comprehensive dataset suite specifically designed for anesthesiology reasoning in LLMs. The suite features AnesBench, an evaluation benchmark tailored to assess anesthesiology-related reasoning across three levels: factual retrieval (System 1), hybrid reasoning (System 1.x), and complex decision-making (System 2). Alongside this benchmark, the suite includes three training datasets that provide an infrastructure for continued pre-training (CPT), supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). Code/project link: https://github.com/MiliLab/AnesSuite

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Medical Vision-Language Models (VLMs) hold immense promise for complex clinical tasks, but their reasoning capabilities are often constrained by text-only paradigms that fail to ground inferences in visual evidence. This limitation not only curtails performance on tasks requiring fine-grained visual analysis but also introduces risks of visual hallucination in safety-critical applications. Thus, we introduce MedVR, a novel reinforcement learning framework that enables annotation-free visual reasoning for medical VLMs. Its core innovation lies in two synergistic mechanisms: Entropy-guided Visual Regrounding (EVR) uses model uncertainty to direct exploration, while Consensus-based Credit Assignment (CCA) distills pseudo-supervision from rollout agreement.

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) are increasingly capable of answering medical questions that require joint reasoning over images and text, yet training general medical VQA systems is impeded by the lack of large, openly usable, high-quality corpora. We present MedVLSynther, a rubric-guided generator-verifier framework that synthesizes high-quality multiple-choice VQA items directly from open biomedical literature by conditioning on figures, captions, and in-text references. The generator produces self-contained stems and parallel, mutually exclusive options under a machine-checkable JSON schema; a multi-stage verifier enforces essential gates (self-containment, single correct answer, clinical validity, image-text consistency), awards fine-grained positive points, and penalizes common failure modes before acceptance. Applying this pipeline to PubMed Central yields MedSynVQA: 13,087 audited questions over 14,803 images spanning 13 imaging modalities and 28 anatomical regions.

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has proven effective in enhancing large language models by encouraging step-by-step intermediate reasoning, and recent advances have extended this paradigm to Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). In the medical domain, where diagnostic decisions depend on nuanced visual cues and sequential reasoning, CoT aligns naturally with clinical thinking processes. However, current benchmarks for medical image understanding generally focus on the final answer while ignoring the reasoning path. An opaque process lacks reliable bases for judgment, making it difficult to assist doctors in diagnosis.

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. In clinical practice, physicians refrain from making decisions when patient information is insufficient. This behavior, known as abstention, is a critical safety mechanism preventing potentially harmful misdiagnoses. Recent investigations have reported the application of large language models (LLMs) in medical scenarios. However, existing LLMs struggle with the abstentions, frequently providing overconfident responses despite incomplete information. This limitation stems from conventional abstention methods relying solely on model self-assessments, which lack systematic strategies to identify knowledge boundaries with external medical evidences.

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Medical image segmentation is fundamental to clinical decision-making, yet existing models remain fragmented. They are usually trained on single knowledge sources and specific to individual tasks, modalities, or organs. This fragmentation contrasts sharply with clinical practice, where experts seamlessly integrate diverse knowledge: anatomical priors from training, exemplar-based reasoning from reference cases, and iterative refinement through real-time interaction. We present $\textbf{K-Prism}$, a unified segmentation framework that mirrors this clinical flexibility by systematically integrating three knowledge paradigms: (i) $\textit{semantic priors}$ learned from annotated datasets, (ii) $\textit{in-context knowledge}$ from few-shot reference examples, and (iii) $\textit{interactive feedback}$ from user inputs like clicks or scribbles. Code/project link: https://github.com/bangwayne/K-Prism

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. LLMs are increasingly being used in healthcare. This promises to free physicians from drudgery, enabling better care to be delivered at scale. But the use of LLMs in this space also brings risks; for example, such models may worsen existing biases. How can we spot when LLMs are (spuriously) relying on patient race to inform predictions? In this work we assess the degree to which Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) can reveal (and control) associations the model has made between race and stigmatizing concepts. We first identify SAE latents in gemma-2 models which appear to correlate with Black individuals.

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Large visual language models (VLMs) have shown strong multi-modal medical reasoning ability, but most operate as end-to-end black boxes, diverging from clinicians’ evidence-based, staged workflows and hindering clinical accountability. Complementarily, expert visual grounding models can accurately localize regions of interest (ROIs), providing explicit, reliable evidence that improves both reasoning accuracy and trust. In this paper, we introduce **CARE**, advancing **C**linical **A**ccountability in multi-modal medical **R**easoning with an **E**vidence-grounded agentic framework. Unlike existing approaches that couple grounding and reasoning within a single generalist model, CARE decomposes the task into coordinated sub-modules to reduce shortcut learning and hallucination: a compact VLM proposes relevant medical entities; an expert entity-referring segmentation model produces pixel-level ROI evidence; and a grounded VLM reasons over the full image augmented by ROI hints.

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Large language models perform well on many medical QA benchmarks, but real clinical reasoning is harder because diagnosis often requires integrating evidence across multiple images rather than interpreting a single view. We introduce MedThinkVQA, an expert-annotated benchmark for thinking with multiple images, in which models must interpret each image, combine cross-view evidence, and solve diagnostic questions under intermediate supervision and step-level evaluation. The dataset contains 10,067 cases, including 720 test cases, with an average of 6.68 images per case, substantially denser than prior work (earlier maxima $\leq$ 1.43). On the test set, the best closed-source models, Claude-4.6-opus, Gemini-3-pro, and GPT-5.2-xhigh, achieve only 54.9%--57.2% accuracy, while smaller proprietary variants, GPT-5-mini/nano, drop to 39.7% and 30.8%.

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Recent generative pre-trained vision–language (GPTv) models have achieved remarkable success in multi-modal understanding, inspiring their adaptation to medical imaging tasks such as disease diagnosis and visual question answering (VQA). However, current instruction-tuned GPTv models suffer from two key challenges: (1) medical attributes (e.g., disease names, severity grades) are encoded as plain text tokens, collapsing semantically distinct concepts into nearly identical textual sequences; and (2) inadequate textual supervision weakens visual representation learning, leading to severe inter-attribute confusion and misaligned vision–language embeddings. To address these limitations, we introduce attribute tokens (AttTok), a set of pre‑defined special tokens that uniquely encode clinical attributes (e.g., imaging modality, diagnosis, severity) within a structured token space. Complemented by attribute‑centric embedding books, AttTok serves as anchor points for aligning both visual and textual modalities into a shared, discriminative representation space.

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on standard medical benchmarks, yet their true clinical reasoning ability remains unclear. Existing datasets predominantly emphasize classification accuracy, creating an evaluation illusion in which models appear proficient while still failing at high-stakes diagnostic reasoning. We introduce Neural-MedBench, a compact yet reasoning-intensive benchmark specifically designed to probe the limits of multimodal clinical reasoning in neurology. Neural-MedBench integrates multi-sequence MRI scans, structured electronic health records, and clinical notes, and encompasses three core task families: differential diagnosis, lesion recognition, and rationale generation. Code/project link: https://neuromedbench.github.io/

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Modern clinical diagnosis relies on the comprehensive analysis of multi-modal patient data, drawing on medical expertise to ensure systematic and rigorous reasoning. Recent advances in Vision–Language Models (VLMs) and agent-based methods are reshaping medical diagnosis by effectively integrating multi-modal information. However, they often output direct answers and empirical-driven conclusions without clinical evidence supported by quantitative analysis, which compromises their reliability and hinders clinical usability. Here we propose MedAgent-Pro, an agentic reasoning paradigm that mirrors modern diagnosis principles via a hierarchical diagnostic workflow, consisting of disease-level standardized plan generation and patient-level personalized step-by-step reasoning.

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Current medical language model (LM) benchmarks often over-simplify the complexities of day-to-day clinical practice tasks and instead rely on evaluating LMs on multiple-choice board exam questions. In psychiatry especially, these challenges are worsened by fairness and bias issues, since models can be swayed by patient demographics even when those factors should not influence clinical decisions. Thus, we present an expert-created and annotated dataset spanning five critical domains of decision-making in mental healthcare: treatment, diagnosis, documentation, monitoring, and triage. This U.S. centric dataset — created without any LM assistance — is designed to capture the nuanced clinical reasoning and daily ambiguities mental health practitioners encounter, reflecting the inherent complexities of care delivery that are missing from existing datasets.

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Automatic radiology reporting assists radiologists in diagnosing abnormalities in radiology images, where grounding the automatic diagnosis with abnormality locations is important for the report interpretability. However, existing supervised-learning methods could lead to learning the superficial statistical correlations between images and reports, lacking multi-faceted reasoning to critique the relevant regions on which radiologists would focus. Recently, self-critical reasoning has been investigated in test-time scaling approaches to alleviate hallucinations of LLMs with increased time complexity. In this work, we focus on chest X-ray report generation with particular focus on clinical accuracy, where self-critical reasoning is alternatively introduced into the model architecture and their training objective, preferred by the real-time automatic reporting system.

ICLR 2026 Poster accepted paper at ICLR 2026. Psychiatric comorbidity is clinically significant yet challenging due to the complexity of multiple co-occurring disorders. To address this, we develop a novel approach integrating synthetic patient electronic medical record (EMR) construction and multi-agent diagnostic dialogue generation. We create 502 synthetic EMRs for common comorbid conditions using a pipeline that ensures clinical relevance and diversity. Our multi-agent framework transfers the clinical interview protocol into a hierarchical state machine and context tree, supporting over 130 diagnostic states while maintaining clinical standards.

ICLR 2026 Poster 论文，提出 MedAgent-Pro：一种面向证据型多模态医学诊断的推理 Agent 工作流。该方法围绕疾病层面的标准化计划生成与患者层面的个性化逐步推理，结合检索增强生成、医学指南对齐、视觉模型等专业工具与证据型反思机制，服务于更可靠、可解释的医学诊断推理。

Med-PaLM Multimodal evaluates a generalist biomedical AI system across medical question answering, imaging, report generation, and multimodal tasks.